Skip to content
Business, Operations & Fundraising·Lesson 48 of 49

Case Study: Hall of Fame Programs Decoded

Reverse-engineer what real FIRST Hall of Fame teams and recent Impact Award winners actually did, extracting transferable operational patterns you can adopt.

Sign in to track progress, earn XP, and save lessons.

The FIRST Hall of Fame comprises teams that have won the FIRST Championship Impact Award (formerly the Chairman's Award) — the most prestigious award in FIRST. Studying them reveals repeatable patterns, not one-off luck.

Case 1 — Team 1311, Kell Robotics (Hall of Fame, 2018 Houston Championship Chairman's Award). Based in Kennesaw, Georgia. Operational signatures:

  • Multiplier mentoring at scale: 25 FLL, 1 FTC, and 18 FRC teams mentored.
  • Educator development: a teacher professional development program with Kennesaw State University granting 32 hours of professional credit.
  • Policy leadership: led efforts in Georgia to create extended-day pay for teachers coaching robotics teams after school.
  • Leadership institutionalization: formal student-leadership recognition and a deep, diversified sponsor base. Transferable pattern: pair a broad, diversified funding base with high-leverage outreach (mentoring + educator training) and formal leadership development.

Case 2 — Team 1816, The Green Machine (Hall of Fame, 2019 Detroit Championship Chairman's Award). Based in Edina, Minnesota, and the longest-sustaining FRC team in the state. Operational signatures:

  • Systemic advocacy: contributions to ESSA Title IV, Part A language and the 2019 Perkins reauthorization.
  • Strategic funding: secured a $100,000 Minnesota DEED grant to establish five Competitive Robotics Hubs statewide — infrastructure, not just season money.
  • Replicable resources: published outreach resources other teams use. Transferable pattern: climb to policy-level impact and pursue infrastructure-scale grants that benefit the broader community, not only your own team.

Case 3 — Recent Championship Impact Award winners. The award continues to recognize new programs: Team 2486, CocoNuts (Flagstaff, Arizona, with a mission centered on making STEM accessible across Northern Arizona including the Diné/Navajo Nation) won the 2024 FIRST Championship Impact Award in Houston, and Team 5985, Project Bucephalus (Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia) won the 2025 Championship Impact Award. Their recognition shows the path is open to teams of varied size and geography — including international teams — not just legacy giants. Transferable pattern: sustained, well-documented, measurable impact wins regardless of team age or location.

Common threads across all of them:

  1. Leverage over hours — they multiply impact through other teams and educators.
  2. Diversified, durable funding — many sponsors and strategic grants, not one benefactor.
  3. Institutionalization — values, leadership pipelines, and documentation outlive any individual.
  4. Measurable, documented impact — they can prove what they did with numbers and records.

Your action: pick one pattern you do not yet do — a multiplier program, a diversification push, a leadership charter, or an impact-measurement system — and implement it this season. Hall of Fame status is the cumulative result of these operational choices made consistently over years, and every one of them is something a deliberate team can copy.

Key takeaways

  • Hall of Fame teams win the Championship Impact Award; their success follows repeatable operational patterns, not luck.
  • Team 1311 (HoF 2018): 25 FLL/1 FTC/18 FRC teams mentored and a 32-hour KSU teacher PD program, backed by a diversified sponsor base.
  • Team 1816 (HoF 2019): policy advocacy (ESSA Title IV, 2019 Perkins) and a $100K Minnesota DEED grant for five robotics hubs.
  • Recent winners (Team 2486 CocoNuts, 2024; Team 5985 Project Bucephalus, 2025) prove the path is open to teams of any size or geography through documented, measurable impact.

Lesson quiz

Required

Answer all 3 questions correctly to complete this lesson.

1.How does an FRC team earn membership in the FIRST Robotics Competition Hall of Fame?

2.What ongoing role does FIRST expect of Hall of Fame teams after their induction?

3.When judges evaluate the sustained excellence that characterizes Hall of Fame-caliber programs, the Impact Award criteria place special emphasis on what?

Answer every question to submit.